<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter gets the spammer treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guesto.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/twitter-gets-the-spammer-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guesto.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/twitter-gets-the-spammer-treatment/</link>
	<description>Aspiring Digital Raconteur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: guesto</title>
		<link>http://guesto.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/twitter-gets-the-spammer-treatment/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>guesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guesto.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-652</guid>
		<description>@ Duncan, yep I agree it is a time consuming strategy, so hopefully the spammers won&#039;t bother.

And that tweet squeeze article, did you see the image of the two chicks with guns on it?  Love it!  http://www.twittersqueeze.com/images/twitter-squeeze-header.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Duncan, yep I agree it is a time consuming strategy, so hopefully the spammers won&#8217;t bother.</p>
<p>And that tweet squeeze article, did you see the image of the two chicks with guns on it?  Love it!  <a href="http://www.twittersqueeze.com/images/twitter-squeeze-header.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.twittersqueeze.com/images/twitter-squeeze-header.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://guesto.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/twitter-gets-the-spammer-treatment/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guesto.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Me, I just get US real estate agents. Every time there&#039;s buzz about something new, the bottom-feeders flog their desperate software and pamphlets (see www.twittersqueeze.com for example) to still more desperate punters (and you can&#039;t get much more desperate than US real estate right now). 

Guess they&#039;re assuming that - now the novelty&#039;s long worn off for people opening email from anyone that sends something interesting-sounding - it&#039;s time to get on the latest social stuff and get naive users to follow them in return.  I&#039;d say that it&#039;s a desperate attempt to make spam economics work for Twitter but there&#039;s a big difference between getting an email out to a couple of million people and posting a tweet to what, a couple of hundred if they&#039;re lucky? Even Obama has less than 250k following....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me, I just get US real estate agents. Every time there&#8217;s buzz about something new, the bottom-feeders flog their desperate software and pamphlets (see <a href="http://www.twittersqueeze.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.twittersqueeze.com</a> for example) to still more desperate punters (and you can&#8217;t get much more desperate than US real estate right now). </p>
<p>Guess they&#8217;re assuming that &#8211; now the novelty&#8217;s long worn off for people opening email from anyone that sends something interesting-sounding &#8211; it&#8217;s time to get on the latest social stuff and get naive users to follow them in return.  I&#8217;d say that it&#8217;s a desperate attempt to make spam economics work for Twitter but there&#8217;s a big difference between getting an email out to a couple of million people and posting a tweet to what, a couple of hundred if they&#8217;re lucky? Even Obama has less than 250k following&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
